<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Principles</title>
	<atom:link href="http://fullspectrumpolitics.net/principles/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://fullspectrumpolitics.net</link>
	<description>The Center for General Interest Politics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 01:57:38 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://fullspectrumpolitics.net/principles/comment-page-1/#comment-2432</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 01:57:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cgip.us/?page_id=771#comment-2432</guid>
		<description>In my opinion, the principles are fine the way they are.  These aren&#039;t meant to be perceived as internally consistent.  They are collectively meant to encompass the entirety of the best of human culture.

If you don&#039;t agree with the Family Principles, then blue isn&#039;t in your &quot;personal spectrum&quot;.  There are people who do, and blue is in their personal spectrum.
One of my pet theories is that, taken collectively, the individual personal spectra balance each other out as a whole, but that each are necessary in equal measure for the survival and happiness of the race as a whole as well as particular people groups.

It sounds like the Self Principles resonate with you more.  That&#039;s fine.  Any other principles you agree with puts those colors in your personal spectrum.  It&#039;s my theory that everyone has a quantifiable personal spectrum that reflects their cultural attitude, and that the people whose spectra the voting populace has a right to know about are those who politically represent them.  Thankfully, in the United States most of that information is publicly available.

Thank you very much for your comment.  Congratulations on being the first comment left on this site by someone who is not myself.  I welcome any further feedback you may have.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In my opinion, the principles are fine the way they are.  These aren&#8217;t meant to be perceived as internally consistent.  They are collectively meant to encompass the entirety of the best of human culture.</p>
<p>If you don&#8217;t agree with the Family Principles, then blue isn&#8217;t in your &#8220;personal spectrum&#8221;.  There are people who do, and blue is in their personal spectrum.<br />
One of my pet theories is that, taken collectively, the individual personal spectra balance each other out as a whole, but that each are necessary in equal measure for the survival and happiness of the race as a whole as well as particular people groups.</p>
<p>It sounds like the Self Principles resonate with you more.  That&#8217;s fine.  Any other principles you agree with puts those colors in your personal spectrum.  It&#8217;s my theory that everyone has a quantifiable personal spectrum that reflects their cultural attitude, and that the people whose spectra the voting populace has a right to know about are those who politically represent them.  Thankfully, in the United States most of that information is publicly available.</p>
<p>Thank you very much for your comment.  Congratulations on being the first comment left on this site by someone who is not myself.  I welcome any further feedback you may have.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WatchTheFlows</title>
		<link>http://fullspectrumpolitics.net/principles/comment-page-1/#comment-2430</link>
		<dc:creator>WatchTheFlows</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 00:37:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cgip.us/?page_id=771#comment-2430</guid>
		<description>Hmmm . . . you start with this:  &quot;Each and every human has the freedoms, responsibilities, and dignities of a sentient being, made in the image of his or her creator, including self-preservation, self-fulfillment &amp; self-defense.&quot;

And then, further down, assert that &quot;The ideal marriage is between one man and one woman.&quot;

Sounds like these principles have a way to go.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmmm . . . you start with this:  &#8220;Each and every human has the freedoms, responsibilities, and dignities of a sentient being, made in the image of his or her creator, including self-preservation, self-fulfillment &amp; self-defense.&#8221;</p>
<p>And then, further down, assert that &#8220;The ideal marriage is between one man and one woman.&#8221;</p>
<p>Sounds like these principles have a way to go.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Center for General Interest Politics &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Based on Principles.</title>
		<link>http://fullspectrumpolitics.net/principles/comment-page-1/#comment-333</link>
		<dc:creator>The Center for General Interest Politics &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Based on Principles.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Feb 2009 03:41:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cgip.us/?page_id=771#comment-333</guid>
		<description>[...] basis for this project can be summed up in about 400 words. Read them, and if you agree, even with only some of them, stay tuned. If you would like to help, contact us [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] basis for this project can be summed up in about 400 words. Read them, and if you agree, even with only some of them, stay tuned. If you would like to help, contact us [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

