Comments for Full Spectrum Politics

Comment on The Principles by admin

admin — Tue, 20 Oct 2009 01:57:38 +0000

In my opinion, the principles are fine the way they are. These aren’t meant to be perceived as internally consistent. They are collectively meant to encompass the entirety of the best of human culture.

If you don’t agree with the Family Principles, then blue isn’t in your “personal spectrum”. There are people who do, and blue is in their personal spectrum.
One of my pet theories is that, taken collectively, the individual personal spectra balance each other out as a whole, but that each are necessary in equal measure for the survival and happiness of the race as a whole as well as particular people groups.

It sounds like the Self Principles resonate with you more. That’s fine. Any other principles you agree with puts those colors in your personal spectrum. It’s my theory that everyone has a quantifiable personal spectrum that reflects their cultural attitude, and that the people whose spectra the voting populace has a right to know about are those who politically represent them. Thankfully, in the United States most of that information is publicly available.

Thank you very much for your comment. Congratulations on being the first comment left on this site by someone who is not myself. I welcome any further feedback you may have.

Comment on The Principles by WatchTheFlows

WatchTheFlows — Tue, 20 Oct 2009 00:37:25 +0000

Hmmm . . . you start with this: “Each and every human has the freedoms, responsibilities, and dignities of a sentient being, made in the image of his or her creator, including self-preservation, self-fulfillment & self-defense.”

And then, further down, assert that “The ideal marriage is between one man and one woman.”

Sounds like these principles have a way to go.

Comment on Top Family Ratings by An Ensign Demoted. « Full Spectrum Politics

An Ensign Demoted. « Full Spectrum Politics — Wed, 17 Jun 2009 17:32:50 +0000

[...] course, any divorce or affair hurts the Family Ratings here at Full Spectrum Politics. Here are the numbers for the “Honorable” Senator, [...]

Comment on John Ensign by An Ensign Demoted. « Full Spectrum Politics

An Ensign Demoted. « Full Spectrum Politics — Wed, 17 Jun 2009 17:27:48 +0000

[...] Senator John Ensign has admitted to fooling around with a campaign staffer behind his wife’s back and today has resigned from his leadership post in the Senate, as is only right. [...]

Comment on John Warner by The Center for General Interest Politics » Blog Archive » A note about the contents of this website so far.

Tue, 14 Apr 2009 17:02:02 +0000

[...] do not have the background data entered into the website database yet, with the exception of Former U.S. Senator John Warner, whose data I used to validate the website’s ability to pull information from the [...]

Comment on The Principles by The Center for General Interest Politics » Blog Archive » Based on Principles.

Sat, 28 Feb 2009 03:41:35 +0000

[...] basis for this project can be summed up in about 400 words. Read them, and if you agree, even with only some of them, stay tuned. If you would like to help, contact us [...]

Comment on Roger Wicker by The Center for General Interest Politics » Blog Archive » Losing Their Religions?

Sun, 01 Feb 2009 11:51:31 +0000

[...] time dedicated to religious activities of two Senators: the Honorable Senator Tom Coburn, & the Honorable Senator Roger Wicker. This data has been taken into account on their respective profiles, and we will always welcome [...]

Comment on Losing Their Religions? by The Center for General Interest Politics » Blog Archive » Blanche Lincoln

Sat, 31 Jan 2009 18:55:13 +0000