Full Spectrum Politics

FSP now has a fan page on Facebook. You can follow us here.

Office held or being pursued:

South Carolina Congressional Seat, District 3. (SC-3)

References:

Wikipedia article
Vote Smart Profile

Data entered by:

Government, Family, & Market life experience entered by Ben Wisdom.

Rob Carter and I have put together an idea that is worth your review. Check it out.

Senator John Ensign has admitted to fooling around with a campaign staffer behind his wife’s back and today has resigned from his leadership post in the Senate, as is only right.

Of course, any divorce or affair hurts the Family Ratings here at Full Spectrum Politics. Here are the numbers for the “Honorable” Senator, before and after the sleeping around:

2008 Family Rating: 5.25/6.0
2008 Family Ranking: #31

2009 Family Rating: 3.125/3.5
2009 Family Ranking: #45

Senator Ensign now has the dubious distinction of having a lower family rating than his more hypocritical colleague from Nevada, “Dingy” Harry Reid. As for Ensign’s overall Individual Ratings…

2008 Self Rating: 7.26/9.84
2008 Self Ranking: #9

2009 Self Rating: 6.91/9.42
2009 Self Ranking: #11

…He has dropped out of the top ten. That’s a shame.

Office held or being pursued:

US Senate, Pennsylvania 2010

References:

Wikipedia

Data entered by:

Ben Wisdom

[Enter your name here if you enter any data.]

After spending quite a bit of quality time on one of my other projects, I came back here last weekend to put the finishing touches on this project. My objective was twofold:

• Make the interface on the back end as simple and as user-friendly as possible so that anyone can enter data on any elected politician,
• Make the presentation on the front end as clear as possible so that anyone can tell what they wish about the politicians that have been entered into the CGIP database.

So please, register yourself here with a username and password and help your fellow citizens out by doing some research on your representatives, or any politician or political candidate in which you might have an interest. Send me an e-mail at admin -at- cgip -dot- us if you have any questions.

The initial study sample used in the beta version of this website was the U.S. Senate of the 110th Congress. I entered the data for this sample population into a spreadsheet, and calculated the ratings in the spreadsheet. I then took the results of the calculations from the spreadsheet and entered the ratings into the database manually. Because of this, the members of the 110th Congress already entered do not have the background data entered into the website database yet, with the exception of Former U.S. Senator John Warner, whose data I used to validate the website’s ability to pull information from the database.

All that is to say is that if you would like to enter data on a current Senator, if he or she was in the Senate last term and was re-elected, then there is already an entry for each of them. If you would like to enter background data for any of these, please feel free to do so by registering on this site and editing the existing entry in question.

The basis for this project can be summed up in about 400 words. Read them, and if you agree, even with only some of them, stay tuned. If you would like to help, contact us at admin -at- cgip -dot- us .

We’ve only received two responses to our Religion Survey, and both of them were refusals. The only sound in response to the CGIP Religion Survey from the rest of the US Senate has been crickets. It has been about ten weeks since the Religion Survey was sent out to each Senator — one copy to each home office, and one copy to each DC office. From other sources, we have been able to get an estimate of the time dedicated to religious activities of two Senators: the Honorable Senator Tom Coburn, & the Honorable Senator Roger Wicker. This data has been taken into account on their respective profiles, and we will always welcome more precise information for these senators or any others. Until otherwise informed, however, the Potential and Actual Religion ratings for all the other Senators shall be zero.

My personal spectrum is above for the sake of full disclosure. I have started this website because I believe that people should know about their political representatives, and I think that I have found a way to distill a considerable amount of information on any individual into a small square bar chart. I need to learn more PHP to do this automatically for each of the individuals researched here, but as for me, here’s how my own life is distilled into the chart above:

• I have no government service or time in the legal professions. But I am the son of an Army soldier, so I am intimately familiar with military culture, and believe that a strong dedication to self-defense, both personal and national, is necessary to a healthy society.
• I have a bachelor’s degree in Mechanical Engineering, and have worked as an engineer for nine years. This gives me a predilection towards the advancement of technology, and though I understand the value of conservation and good stewardship of our natural resources, I don’t go as far in that respect as some.
• I ran the numbers on my lifetime religious involvement recently: I am the son of a minister (Currently an Army Chaplain), so I definitely started early, but my devotion to religious activity has grown steadily over my life. Also, interaction with followers of other faiths throughout my life have confirmed my dedication to religious liberty.
• I do not yet have a positive Net Worth if my mortgage is counted in the grand total, probably like most people. But I am working hard to change that and am dedicated to the principles of the free market and one day having a positive net worth. If I did happen to sell the house I am living in, I would instantaneously have a positive net worth, which is something that not everyone can say these days.
• I am married, and my third child will be born in a matter of days. Sadly, my second child did not survive the womb due to a genetic defect, but I remain convinced that I will embrace him someday in the next life (See religious dedication outlined above).
• I haven’t run for public office yet, and I don’t know if I ever will. But I have volunteered for non-profit organizations, and have been dedicated to one in particular for about two years. Due to my strong religious predilections that can be clearly seen above, I also give a tenth of my income to charity.
• I am almost thirty-two years old, and I freely admit that my life experience has its gaps, which is why I respect others that have different life histories. This site is dedicated to the proposition that every individual has the potential to contribute something good to society, and that they should be highlighted and encouraged when they do. Nevertheless, I also believe that there are many that choose to reject that potential and live empty, parasitic and narcissistic lives; such people should not be given any more responsibility for others than they have been willing to take for themselves. So this site is also dedicated to showing such people for who they are and removing them from positions of authority whenever possible by lawful means.

I was driving around this afternoon, when my cell phone rang. It was a lady the office of the Honorable Senator George Voinovich. She apologized for taking so long to get back to me, but she just wanted to let me know that the Senator would not be returning the Religion Survey. She wished me luck with my endeavors. When I requested to ask her some basic questions about the Senator, she referred me to his biography on his official senate website. Since that page does not address how much time he has dedicated to religious pursuits, then by his own choice he will receive Religion Ratings of Zero, until new information presents itself.

We are not taking this personally, however, since I found out this afternoon that we are not the only public interest organization the Honorable Senator has snubbed. Between this and Senator Brown’s most expeditious and polite refusal, the representation of the State of Ohio in the Senate is now fully accounted for in terms of its religious predilections.

The other task that I accomplished this weekend was the completed collection of all the federal election data for each Senator in the 110th Congress. I have also included any local election results already on the internet at the various websites for the State Secretaries of State. Any local election results that aren’t already on the internet will take more time to collect, but I have noticed that it can be procured by means of emailing the various offices of each of the Secretaries of State for each State. That will understandably take a while, but it can be done.

The information that will be much more challenging to acquire will be data on each of the Senators’ personal charitable giving. The Senators that ran for the executive branch offices last year made that information publically available, I think, but I am not aware of any way to get this particular information on any of the other Senators without their cooperation. So until anyone communicates with me otherwise, all the Senators will be recorded as contributing 0% of their personal income to charity. So if you would like your Senator’s standings in the Neighbor Ratings to rise, get them to contact me at the e-mail address that I have provided them with the religion surveys: benwisdom -at- gmail -dot- com.

After a much enjoyed hiatus for the holidays, I pushed through with the rest of the data procured thus far, and have finished the Family Ratings for the United States Senate of the 110th Congress.

I still have to spell out on the Family Rating Method page all the references used, as I have for some of the other Ratings. This one was interesting, because I actually dove into the congressional record to find the results of four votes concerning family issues and tabulated them myself. Look for those details on the Rating Method page soon.

With the inclusion of years of business experience, the Market Ratings are now complete for the US Senate of the 110th Congress. That brings us exactly to the halfway point for our initial study sample.

There is now an entry for each Senator of the 110th Congress, and the Government & Science ratings are complete and accurate. There are still data to be gathered for the other five rating categories; I imagine that the next few to be completed will be Family, Market and Neighbor, in about that order.

When the Religion Ratings will be complete depend on the Senators themselves (and of course the Self ratings depend on everything else being done). To encourage more responses, I will be making contact with the senators’ offices, both by telephone and e-mail in the coming weeks. The time isn’t yet ripe to enlist others’ help with this, though that may come eventually.

I guess I should start working on the ratings for the Senate class of 2008 coming in for the 111th Congress also. When that’s done, the 110th and 11th Congresses can be compared, which should be very interesting indeed.

Notes:

• Religion Survey not yet returned.
• Neighbor Ratings imprecise: local election results and charitable giving not yet included.
• Self Rating not precise due to missing information indicated above.

Notes:

• Religion Survey not yet returned.
• Neighbor Ratings imprecise: local elections and charitable giving not yet included.
• Self Rating not precise due to missing information indicated above.

Notes:

• Religion Survey not yet returned.
• Neighbor Ratings imprecise: local elections and charitable giving not yet included.
• Self Rating not precise due to missing information indicated above.

Notes:

• Religion Survey not yet returned.
• Neighbor Ratings imprecise: local elections and charitable giving not yet included.
• Self Rating not precise due to missing information indicated above.

Notes:

• Religion Survey not yet returned.
• Neighbor Actual Rating imprecise: Charitable giving not yet available.
• Financial Disclosure information not compiled on Open Secrets. More work needed to derive Market Potential Rating.
• Self Rating not precise due to missing information indicated above.

Notes:

• Religion Survey declined. This yields a Religion Rating of zero.
• Neighbor Ratings imprecise: Local election history and charitable contributions not yet included.
• Self Rating not precise due to missing information indicated above.

Notes:

• Religion Survey not yet returned.
• Neighbor Ratings imprecise: 1992 special election results and charitable giving not yet included.
• Self Rating not precise due to missing information indicated above.

Notes:

• Religion Survey not yet returned.
• Neighbor Ratings imprecise: local elections and charitable giving not yet included.
• Self Rating not precise due to missing information indicated above.

Notes:

• Religion Survey not yet returned.
• Neighbor Ratings imprecise: Election history does not yet include four local elections (1974, 1976, 1978 & 1980). Also, charitable giving is not yet included.
• Self Rating not precise due to missing information indicated above.

Notes:

• Religion Survey not yet returned.
• Neighbor Ratings imprecise: local elections and charitable giving not yet included.
• Self Rating not precise due to missing information indicated above.

Notes:

• Religion Survey not yet returned.
• Neighbor Ratings imprecise: local elections and charitable giving not yet included.
• Self Rating not precise due to missing information indicated above.

Notes:

• Religion Survey not yet returned.
• Neighbor Ratings imprecise: local elections and charitable giving not yet included.
• Self Rating not precise due to missing information indicated above.

Notes:

• Religion Survey not yet returned.
• Neighbor Actual Rating imprecise: Charitable giving not yet included.
• Self Rating not precise due to missing information indicated above.

Notes:

• Religion Survey not yet returned.
• Actual Rating imprecise: Charitable giving not yet available.
• Self Rating not precise due to missing information indicated above.

Notes:

• Religion Survey not yet returned.
• Neighbor Ratings imprecise: Some local elections not yet included. Also, charitable giving not yet available.
• Self Rating not precise due to missing information indicated above.

Notes:

• The Senator’s office declined phone on his behalf by telephone to return the Religion Survey at 2:45pm EST, January 5th, 2009. This yields Religion Ratings of zero.
• Neighbor Ratings imprecise: local elections and charitable giving not yet included.
• Self Rating not precise due to missing information indicated above.

Notes:

• Religion Survey not yet returned, but internet research shows that he has been considerably active in his home church. Since about 1982, he has been a member of Tupelo First Baptist church, and has served in a number of roles there: Sunday school teacher, member of the choir, deacon, and chairman of the deacons. Until more precise information is provided, and a religious freedom voting record has been determined, this yield him Potential and Actual Religion ratings of about 40 and 20, respectively.
• Neighbor Ratings imprecise: local elections and charitable giving not yet included.
• Self Rating not precise due to missing information indicated above.

Notes:

• Religion Survey not yet returned.
• Actual Neighbor Rating imprecise: Charitable giving not yet available.
• Self Rating not precise due to missing information indicated above.

Notes:

• Religion Survey not yet returned.
• Neighbor Actual Rating imprecise: Charitable giving not yet available.
• Self Rating not precise due to missing information indicated above.

Notes:

• Religion Survey not returned after 10 weeks. Ratings will be zero until otherwise informed.
• Neighbor Ratings imprecise: local elections and charitable giving not yet included.
• Self Rating not precise due to missing information indicated above.

Notes:

• Religion Survey not yet returned.
• Neighbor Ratings imprecise: local elections and charitable giving not yet included.
• Self Rating not precise due to missing information indicated above.

Notes:

• Religion Survey not yet returned.
• Neighbor Ratings imprecise: local elections and charitable giving not yet included.
• Self Rating not precise due to missing information indicated above.

I just finished making a page showing exactly how far along we are with the initial study sample of the United States Senate. Overall, the data entry we are about one-third of the way done, and the quickly approaching completion of all the data entry for the Government and Science Ratings will mark the halfway point. Stay tuned.

Notes:

• Religion Survey not yet returned.
• Neighbor Ratings do not yet include local election results or charitable giving.
• Self Rating not precise due to missing information indicated above.

Notes:

• Religion Survey not yet returned.
• Neighbor Actual Rating: Charitable giving is not yet available.
• Self Rating not precise due to missing information indicated above.

Notes:

• Religion Survey not yet returned.
• Neighbor Actual Rating imprecise: Charitable giving not yet included.
• Self Rating not precise due to missing information indicated above.

Notes:

• Religion Survey not yet returned.
• Neighbor Actual Rating imprecise: Charitable giving not yet shown.
• Self Rating not precise due to missing information indicated above.

Notes:

• Religion Survey not yet returned.
• Neighbor Ratings imprecise; Local elections and Charitable giving not yet included.
• Self Rating not precise due to missing information indicated above.

Notes:

• Religion Survey not yet returned.
• Neighbor Ratings imprecise; Local elections and Charitable giving not yet included.
• Self Rating not precise due to missing information indicated above.

Notes:

• Religion Survey not yet returned.
• Neighbor Actual Rating imprecise: charitable contributions not yet included.
• Self Rating not precise due to missing information indicated above.

Notes:

• Religion Survey not yet returned.
• Neighbor Rating imprecise: Election history does not yet include any local elections. Also charitable giving not yet included.
• Self Rating not precise due to missing information indicated above.

Notes:

• Religion Survey not yet returned.
• Neighbor Actual Rating imprecise: Charitable giving not yet included.
• Self Rating not precise due to missing information indicated above.

Notes:

• Religion Survey not yet returned.
• Neighbor Actual Rating imprecise: Charitable giving not yet included.
• Self Rating not precise due to missing information indicated above.

Notes:

• Religion Survey not yet returned.
• Neighbor Ratings imprecise: 2008 election results not yet included. Also charitable giving not yet included.
• Self Rating not precise due to missing information indicated above.

Notes:

• Religion Survey not yet returned.
• Neighbor Ratings imprecise: Election history does not yet include local elections. Also charitable giving not yet included.
• Self Rating not precise due to missing information indicated above.

Notes:

• Religion Survey not yet returned.
• Neighbor Ratings imprecise: Election History only currently goes back to 1988. Also, charitable giving is not yet available.
• Self Rating not precise due to missing information indicated above.

Notes:

• Religion Survey not yet returned.
• Neighbor Actual Rating imprecise: Charitable giving not yet included.
• Self Rating not precise due to missing information indicated above.

Notes:

• Religion Survey not yet returned.
• Neighbor Actual Rating imprecise: Charitable giving not yet included.
• Self Rating not precise due to missing information indicated above.

Notes:

• Religion Survey not yet returned.
• Neighbor Ratings imprecise: Election history does not yet include three local elections (1972, 1974 & 1976). Also, charitable giving is not yet included.
• Self Rating not precise due to missing information indicated above.

Notes:

• Religion Survey not yet returned.
• Neighbor Actual Rating imprecise: Charitable giving not yet included.
• Self Rating not precise due to missing information indicated above.

Notes:

• Religion Survey not yet returned.
• Neighbor Actual Rating imprecise: Charitable giving not yet included.
• Self Rating not precise due to missing information indicated above.

strong>Notes:

• Religion Survey not yet returned.
• Neighbor Actual Rating imprecise: Charitable giving not yet included.
• Self Rating not precise due to missing information indicated above.

Notes:

• Religion Survey not yet returned.
• Neighbor Actual Rating imprecise: Charitable giving not yet included.
• Self Rating not precise due to missing information indicated above.

Notes:

• Religion Survey not yet returned.
• Neighbor Actual Rating: Charitable giving is not yet available.
• Self Rating not precise due to missing information indicated above.

Notes:

• Religion Survey not yet returned.
• Neighbor Actual Rating imprecise: Charitable giving not yet included.
• Self Rating not precise due to missing information indicated above.

Notes:

• Religion Survey not yet returned.
• Neighbor Actual Rating imprecise: Charitable giving not yet included.
• Self Rating not precise due to missing information indicated above.

Notes:

• Religion Survey not yet returned.
• Neighbor Actual Rating imprecise: Charitable giving not yet included.
• Self Rating not precise due to missing information indicated above.

Notes:

• Religion Survey not yet returned.
• Neighbor Actual Rating imprecise: Charitable giving is not yet available.
• Self Rating not precise due to missing information indicated above.

Notes:

• Religion Survey not yet returned.
• Neighbor Actual Rating imprecise: Charitable giving not yet included.
• Self Rating not precise due to missing information indicated above.

Notes:

• Religion Survey not yet returned.
• Neighbor Actual Rating imprecise: Charitable giving not yet included.
• Self Rating not precise due to missing information indicated above.

Notes:

• Religion Survey not yet returned.
• Neighbor Actual Rating imprecise: Charitable giving not yet included.
• Self Rating not precise due to missing information indicated above.

I was quite excited to get an envelope in the mail today with a signature on it in place of a stamp. (Apparently, our legislators don’t apply postage to their mail in the same way as those whom they serve. This is an interesting fact of which I was not aware. Now you know too.)

The signature was that of the Honorable Senator Sherrod Brown of Ohio. It was a short, courteous letter declining to return the CGIP Religion Survey. [I will be putting up a scan of it as soon as I can UPDATE 12/19/08: The scan of the letter is up. Sorry to take so long.] I still have to finish completing the research on his election history for the Neighbor Rating, so his profile is not complete yet. But his Religion Rating, both Potential and Actual, is currently zero due to this declination.

I imagine that we’ll get more negative responses sooner rather than later, because doing nothing takes much less time than actually doing something, but I have no problem with issuing more “Zero” Religion ratings based on the politicians’ actual responses, because in the end they are accountable for their own responses.

I’m fairly certain that when all is done, I will get positive responses too. Initial research gives some indication from whom some of those positive responses will come, but I also look forward to being pleasantly surprised by good responses coming from “unexpected” quarters as well.

But just for today, I will bask in the mere acknowledgment received. They know we’re here, and that’s a good start.

Notes:

• Religion Survey not yet returned.
• Neighbor Actual Rating imprecise: Charitable giving not yet included.
• Self Rating not precise due to missing information indicated above.

Notes:

• Religion Survey not yet returned.
• Neighbor Actual Rating imprecise: Charitable giving not yet included.
• Self Rating not precise due to missing information indicated above.

Notes:

• Religion Survey not yet returned.
• Neighbor Actual Rating imprecise: Charitable giving not yet included.
• Self Rating not precise due to missing information indicated above.

Notes:

• Religion Survey not yet returned.
• Self Rating not precise due to missing information indicated above.

Notes:

• Religion Survey not yet returned.
• Neighbor Actual Rating imprecise: Charitable giving not yet included.
• Self Rating not precise due to missing information indicated above.

Notes:

• Religion Survey not yet returned.
• Neighbor Actual Rating imprecise: Charitable giving not yet included.
• Self Rating not precise due to missing information indicated above.

Notes:

• Religion Survey not yet returned.
• Neighbor Rating imprecise: Charitable giving not yet included.
  Also, voter turnout data for Connecticut can only be estimated for the year 1974.
• Self Rating not precise due to missing information indicated above.

Notes:

• Religion Survey not yet returned.
• Neighbor Ratings imprecise; Local elections and Charitable giving not yet included.
• Self Rating not precise due to missing information indicated above.

Notes:

• Religion Survey not yet returned.
• Neighbor Actual Rating imprecise: Charitable giving not yet included.
• Self Rating not precise due to missing information indicated above.

Notes:

• Religion Survey not yet returned.
• Neighbor Actual Rating imprecise: Charitable giving is not yet included.
• Self Rating not precise due to missing information indicated above.

Notes:

• Religion Survey not returned after 10 weeks. Ratings will be zero until otherwise informed.
• Neighbor Ratings imprecise; Election History only currently goes back to 1988. Also, charitable giving is not yet available.
• Self Rating not precise due to missing information indicated above.

Notes:

• Religion Survey not returned after 10 weeks. Ratings will be zero until otherwise informed.
• Neighbor Actual Rating imprecise; Charitable giving not yet included.
• Self Rating not precise due to missing information indicated above.

Notes:

• Religion Survey not returned after 10 weeks. Ratings will be zero until otherwise informed.
• Neighbor Actual Rating imprecise; Charitable giving not yet included.
• Self Rating not precise due to missing information indicated above.

Notes:

• Religion Survey not returned after 10 weeks. Ratings will be zero until otherwise informed.
• Neighbor Actual Rating imprecise; Charitable giving not yet included.
• Self Rating not precise due to missing information indicated above.

Notes:

• Religion Survey not yet returned.
• Neighbor Actual Rating imprecise; Charitable giving not yet included.
• Self Rating not precise due to missing information indicated above.

Notes:

• Religion Survey not returned after 10 weeks. Ratings will be zero until otherwise informed.
• Neighbor Actual Rating imprecise; Charitable giving not yet included.
• Self Rating not precise due to missing information indicated above.

Notes:

• Religion Survey not returned after 10 weeks. Ratings will be zero until otherwise informed.
• Neighbor Actual Rating imprecise; Charitable giving not yet included.
• Self Rating not precise due to missing information indicated above.

Notes:

• Religion Survey not returned after 10 weeks. Ratings will be zero until otherwise informed.
• Neighbor Actual Rating imprecise; Charitable giving not yet included.
• Self Rating not precise due to missing information indicated above.

Notes:

• Religion Survey not yet returned.
• Neighbor Actual Rating imprecise: Charitable giving is not yet included.
• Self Rating not precise due to missing information indicated above.

Notes:

• Religion Survey not yet returned, But his Wikipedia entry states that he has served as a deacon in the Southern Baptist Church from about 1983 until perhaps 1994. Assuming he is still a member in good standing of that church, this information yields about 30.5 points for his Religion Potential Rating, until more precise information is provided. Actual Religion rating will be half of that until Religious freedom voting record can be determined.
• Neighbor Ratings imprecise: local elections and charitable giving not yet included.
• Self Rating not precise due to missing information indicated above.

Notes:

• Religion Survey not yet returned.
• Neighbor Actual Rating imprecise: Charitable giving not yet included.
• Self Rating not precise due to missing information indicated above.

Notes:

• Religion Survey not yet returned.
• Neighbor Actual Rating imprecise: Charitable giving not yet included.
• Self Rating not precise due to missing information indicated above.

I just finished the top rating lists for each category. They can be found here, here, [but not here yet], here, here, here, and here. There is no link for the Top Religion Ratings page because there is nothing to put in it until the Religion Surveys start coming in. As soon as the first one comes in, that page will be activated too.

Since I found the U.S. Census Report on Voting and Registration, I am starting to have working Neighbor Ratings, so those are going in along with everything else. Data entry on the United States Senators continues apace, so all these new Ratings pages will be in flux until that is done.

Notes:

• Religion Survey not yet returned.
• Neighbor Actual Rating imprecise: Charitable giving not yet included.
• Self Rating not precise due to missing information indicated above.

Notes:

• Religion Survey not yet returned.
• Neighbor Actual Rating imprecise: Charitable giving not yet included.
• Self Rating not precise due to missing information indicated above.

Notes:

• Religion Survey not yet returned.
• Neighbor Ratings imprecise: any local election results and charitable contributions not yet included.
• Self Rating not precise due to missing information indicated above.

Notes:

• Religion Survey not yet returned.
• Neighbor Ratings imprecise: any local election results and charitable contributions not yet included.
• Self Rating not precise due to missing information indicated above.

Notes:

• Religion Survey not yet returned.
• Neighbor Ratings imprecise: any local election results and charitable contributions not yet included.
• Self Rating not precise due to missing information indicated above.

Notes:

• Religion Survey not yet returned.
• Market Ratings imprecise: Financial Disclosure information not compiled on Open Secrets. More work needed to derive Market Potential Rating.
• Neighbor Actual Rating imprecise: Charitable giving not yet shown.
• Self Rating not precise due to missing information indicated above.

Notes:

• Religion Survey not yet returned.
• Neighbor Actual rating imprecise: Charitable giving not yet available.
• Self Rating not precise due to missing information indicated above.

Notes:

• Religion Survey not yet returned.
• Neighbor Actual rating imprecise: Charitable giving not yet available.
• Self Rating not precise due to missing information indicated above.

Notes:

• Religion Survey not yet returned.
• Neighbor Actual Rating imprecise: Charitable giving not yet included.
• Self Rating not precise due to missing information indicated above.

Notes:

• Religion Survey not yet returned.
• Neighbor Ratings imprecise: local election results and charitable giving not yet included.
• Self Rating not precise due to missing information indicated above.